Plotter Pantser and Planters: Which one are you?

Are you a plotter or a pantser? In case these terms are new to you, let me list the definitions.

A plotter is someone who plans their novel before they write it. Outlining their novel before writing is extremely important to these writers.

The term pantser describes someone who “flies by the seat of their pants,” meaning they don’t plan out anything in their story, or plan very little.

At a conference years ago, I was sitting near one of my writer friends, Theresa. When the presenter asked if anyone in the audience would consider themselves a pantser, she immediately raised her hand and pointed to me.

I was not familiar with the term, but she was insistent that it was me.

Reading more into this new term, I agreed she was correct; that is how I wrote at the time.

At that point, I was not familiar with the term, but she was insistent that it was me.

Reading more into this new term, I agreed she was correct; that is how I wrote at the time.

According to a web search, a pantser is a writer who creates their story without a detailed plan or outline, hence the flying by the seat of their pants moniker. This approach allows for spontaneity and creativity, but can also lead to challenges like writer’s block or plot holes.

I have moved on from this terminology to the term plantsers.

This means they follow a little of both the plotter and pantser approach. In reality, most people are plantsers, but some tend to lean heavily to one side or the other.

To be honest, I was not familiar with the term “planters”. If I had come across this term a few years ago, I would still be saying I was a pantser. But as time went on and things changed, I moved toward a hybrid of both.

So there are options on how you write your manuscript. There are pros and cons to both.

Without diving into each in greater detail, where do you feel you fall?

Whatever works for you works for you—just another great topic to discuss among other writers.

Why Writers Need Support Groups for Success

 
When was the last time you talked to a fellow writer, whether live or online?

Hanging out with like-minded people is huge, in my opinion. Discussing various topics is simply amazing.

Finding a writing group in your area is not always an option. Thankfully, the internet offers a plethora of groups. It may take time to find one that suits you, but once you do, the feeling of belonging is fantastic.

I have been a part of many groups. One in fact that I started. We did not always agree, but the core of the group was there. That was to hang out, talk, edit, read, and possibly access resources to help us out.

Doing it alone is not fun, for writing is a solitary endeavor for the most part. And if you don’t have eyes on your manuscripts to give you helpful advice, what you produce can be an ugly mess.

Recently, the writing group I was a part of died due to the host having to deal with her medical issues that needed to be attended to.

That left me once again on the lookout for a group  to join or create another one.  Remembering my first group was from the library system, I searched there. I found a new group starting that I am excited about.

It is new, so I am not walking into a group that is already familiar with each other.   I am not sure if this one will pan out, but I will find out soon, now. I am open to checking it out.

I hope you all have such a group, whether it is in person or online. Who truly gets us except other writers?

Responding to Bad Reviews: Should Authors Engage?

What do you feel when you see that you have received a one or two-star review? It can range from disbelief to unhappiness and anger. And in my case, the need for me to respond to what they wrote.

I thought about it a lot, I wrote my reply, but couldn’t hit send. What could ensue could be bitter and for all the world to see. Is this what I wanted for my book and my brand?

And not only that, if I saw an author going back and forth with a reviewer. What would my reaction be to that? It is easy to reply, but very hard not reply.

Not everyone will like your books. There will always be trolls waiting to put someone down for a few reasons. Sometimes it falls under being mean.

Reaching out to others, a small few said to reply, the vast majority said to hold off, to something I had mentally decided to do. I was concerned the review would be seen.

Would people read and review my books once they saw that? A concern I had was that people would see it and would not read or review my work. I have left very few one or two-star reviews. I tend to reach out to the author to explain my thoughts on the book. They have been grateful that I would go this route instead of leaving a low-ranking review.

I would never, and have never, leave a nasty one; that isn’t my way. I even had someone tell me that having a bad review could be a good thing. People could be curious to know why the review was written and end up reading the book. I am not confident that has happened, but I got the logic of it.

Receiving a low review sometimes comes with no text. The way ebooks are now, you can leave a review by just giving it a star without explaining why. It is too easy now to bring a person’s ranking with no fanfare. I have no control over that. What I can control is not to reply to a nasty review. And I am okay with that now.

The Musings of A New Englander