After taking a character development class the instructor passed out a form on how to critique the members of the group. That made me wonder. It would be awesome, in my opinion, if we could pass this on to our writing group members after they read what we presented to them. It would be also interesting to hand it out to reviewers prior to them submitting their reviews of our books. Granted that could get interesting but also informative.
What would you add or change if you did this yourself?
So if I could pass on a form this is what I would include. Each section is worth five points.
-Attention needs to be paid to plot development
-The story lacks credibility in places
-Good start/good ideas but loses direction and force
-The story holds interest throughout but the ending is disappointing
-Flows smoothly,well researched, almost there
-This is a well-crafted story and it is clear that the author has considered all the aspects of the plot
-The characters do not always come over as real people
-Told from the viewpoint of too many characters, so that the readers learns little about them
-In general, the characters are believable , although there is room for improvement
-The characters are well drawn and true to life/does the character have an inner life
-Strong characterization means that the reader’s sympathies are instantly engaged.
-The story starts slowly
-The story needs a more varied pace
-Side-issues slow the story down
-In general, the story moves well, although there are times when interest wavers
-A good pace is maintained throughout
-This story’s page-turning quality is excellent
-The characters all tend to speak with the same voice
-Some attention should be given to the dialogue, which does not always ring true
-Although the dialogue is believable, there are places where it serves no obvious purpose
-In general, the dialogue sounds authentic
-the sharply written dialogue reveals much about the characters
-The dialogue is excellent, adding a sparking dimension to the story